Safety for Water and Drowning Prevention Are Not the Same Thing. Here's Why That Matters.

If you have ever thought "my kids are in swim lessons, so we are covered on water safety," I want to pause with you right there.

Not to add to your list of things to worry about, but because the aquatics industry has been using two very different concepts interchangeably for decades, it is confusing parents in ways that have real consequences.

So let’s clear it up right now.

There Are Actually Two Things We Are Talking About

When it comes to keeping children safe around water, there are two distinct categories. And once you understand the difference, so much of what you have heard from the swim world will start to make more sense. And honestly, some of it may start to make you a little frustrated too.

The first is drowning prevention.

Drowning prevention refers to the skills and tools that protect a child once they are in the water. Swim lessons fall here. Teaching a child to roll onto their back and float, to get to the wall, to control their breath, that is drowning prevention. It is critically important and I will never tell you otherwise.

Life jackets live in this category too, at least in part. In uncontrolled water environments like lakes, rivers, and oceans, a properly fitted life jacket is a drowning prevention tool. If you want to dive deep on lifejackets and floatation devices, click here.

The second is safety for water.

This is everything that happens outside of the water to prevent a child from getting into a dangerous situation in the first place. Fences. Gates. Door alarms. Active watching. CPR certification. Assigned waiting areas. The Thumbs-Up Rule. Everything in The WATCHING Initiative.

These are not swim skills. They are the safety system we build around water so that the moment of danger never comes.

Why the Distinction Matters

Here is where I get frustrated with my own industry.

The messaging that comes out of the aquatics world almost always boils down to one thing: get your kids in swim lessons.

And while I believe in swim lessons deeply, that advice alone is not a safety plan. It is one piece of a much bigger picture. And for a lot of families, it is not even an accessible piece.

Swim lessons cost money. They require transportation, scheduling, and a child who is ready for the environment. For families with neurodivergent children, finding an instructor who truly understands their child's needs can be an enormous challenge. For families in rural areas or communities without pool access, lessons may simply not be an option at all.

So when the industry says "swim lessons save lives" and stops there, what happens to those families? Are they just supposed to accept that their child is at higher risk?

That is not acceptable to me.

Because here is the truth: drowning prevention through swim skills is not accessible to everyone. But safety for water is.

Every family, regardless of income, location, swim access, or their child's abilities, can build a safety system around water. Every family can learn Active Watching. Every family can get CPR certified. Every family can teach their child to WAIT.

These things do not require a pool membership or a swim instructor. They require a more complete educational system. And that is exactly what has been missing.

The Impossible Position Parents Are Being Put In

I also want to note how difficult it is for parents trying to do the “right” thing.

The aquatics industry tells parents not to use flotation devices in pools because they create false confidence and interfere with swim skill development. That is a fair concern and I have talked about it at length.

And to be fair, some programs do say the right thing. Some instructors and programs tell parents to get in the water with their child, stay within arm's reach, and keep hands on them at all times. That is good guidance and I want to acknowledge it.

But here is the problem. The messaging is not consistent. Some programs encourage active watching from the pool deck. Others say supervise. Others say give capable swimmers permission to enter. And now there is an entire conversation online about permission-based systems and high fives and check-ins. Each of those strategies is designed for a different child at a different stage, but that context rarely gets communicated clearly.

So what about the parent with two young non-swimmers who cannot physically be in the water holding both children at once? What about the family whose child cannot yet access swim lessons at all? What about the autistic child who doesn’t understand permission was given once before so why not now? 

Parents are being handed a mixed message and then quietly judged for the choices they make in the middle of it.

That is not okay. And it is not your fault.

What I Want You to Take Away From This

If swim lessons are part of your family's life, wonderful. Stay consistent, stay involved, and know that the skills your child is building matter.

If swim lessons are not accessible right now for any reason, please do not despair. Your child is not destined to be unsafe around water. There is so much you can do.

Build the safety system. Create the waiting area. WATCH, not supervise. Install the barriers. Get CPR certified. Teach your child that where there is water, we WAIT.

These are the things that protect children before they ever reach the water's edge. These are the things that work everywhere, for every child, in every water environment your family will ever encounter.

Drowning prevention matters. And so does safety for water.

You deserve both. And now you know the difference.


Dayna Harvey is a water safety expert and swimming instructor certified since 1988. She is the founder of The WATCHING Initiative and creator of the Waiting Whales Water Safety Kit. Learn more at watersafetywithmissdayna.com.


Next
Next

We Keep Talking About Pools. But Most Children with Autism Are Not Drowning in Pools.